|
|
Notice the large amount of soil splashed
onto the left flume in this picture. A lot of soil is being
removed by the water flowing across the soil surface in this pan.
There is also some soil loss from the pan on the right, but it is a lot
less, since soil is visible on the flume. The only treatment
difference in these two pans is the amount of wheat straw that is on the
soil surface. |
Holding these two buckets up to the light
really shows the difference in the amount of soil that is lost to
erosion when the surface is left unprotected. The other obvious
difference in the two buckets is the difference in total amounts of
water runoff. The pan that is protected by residue maintains a
higher infiltration rate. Remember this relationship:
Runoff = Rainfall rate - Infiltration rate
Since the rainfall rate is constant, a lower infiltration rate
results in a higher amount of runoff. That's what you can
see in the buckets. More water (as well as more
soil) has runoff
from the unprotected soil. |
This picture was taken four days after the
demonstration. The water was left undisturbed for this entire
time, yet the suspended solids (mostly clays and some organic matter)
have remained in the water. The bucket on the left, which came
from the unprotected soil, has nearly a quarter inch of sediment sitting
on the bottom, while the one to the right, which was protected by wheat
straw, has very little sediment on the bottom. |
Back to top |